[RSArchive Icon] Rudolf Steiner Archive Home  Version 2.5.4
 [ [Table of Contents] | Search ]


[Spacing]
Searching Rudolf Steiner Lectures by GA number (GA0207)
Matches

You may select a new search term and repeat your search. Searches are not case sensitive, and you can use regular expressions in your queries.


Enter your search term:
by: title, keyword, or context
   


   Query type: 
    Query was: father
  

Here are the matching lines in their respective documents. Select one of the highlighted words in the matching lines below to jump to that point in the document.

  • Title: Lecture: The Seeds of Future Worlds
    Matching lines:
    • words, to an affirmation of what we may call the Father God.
    • of the Father God. It is indeed true that if anyone sets out to
    • Father God, he must be in some way ill. To be an atheist is to be
    • consciousness we can come to the Father God, but no further. It is
    • Gospels; that the Gospels are the message of the Father, and that
    • the message of the Father God. Here you may see quite clearly how
    • recognise even in theology only the Father God, and to understand the
    • of the Father God. Thus in the sense of this theology Christ is of
    • true teaching concerning the Father God.
    • implied in this. First, the belief that the message of the Father God cannot
    • there to speak of the Father God; they assumed that the Gospels were
    • opinion that the Gospels speak only of the Father God is proof that
    • between the Father God and God the Son. These fine differences that
    • world, man comes to the Father God. From tradition, he has God the Son.
    • should apply only to the Father God and transfers it to the
    • the Father — but it calls the Father “Christ,”
    • difference between Father and Son. Soloviev is inwardly justified in
    • so speaking because for him both the Father and the Christ are
    • Father and Christ. If you are inwardly honest with yourselves, you
    • Father God and the Christ, the two ideas become confused and
    • Maximum number of matches per file exceeded.
  • Title: Cosmosophy 1: Lecture II
    Matching lines:
    • words, to an affirmation of what may be called the Father
    • Father God. One can even say, as I have often expressed it,
    • up all the natural laws in what is called the Father God, he
    • this Father God. This far one can go with ordinary
    • are the message of the Father, and that Christ Jesus actually
    • message of the Father God. Here you may see quite clearly how
    • people to recognize, even in theology, only the Father God
    • more than the message of the Father God. In the sense of this
    • concerning the Father God.
    • Father God cannot be found by an ordinary study of the world.
    • imagine that the Gospels were to speak of the Father God;
    • Gospels actually speak only of the Father God is proof that
    • the question of the distinction between the Father God and
    • between the Father God and the Son God, which so engaged
    • Father God. From tradition, he has God the Son. The Gospels
    • should apply actually only to the Father God and
    • actually have the Christ at all; it has only the Father, but
    • it calls the Father “Christ,” because at one time
    • between the Father and the Son. Soloviev is justified in
    • speaking in this way, because for him both the Father and the
    • Maximum number of matches per file exceeded.



The Rudolf Steiner Archive is maintained by:
The e.Librarian: elibrarian@elib.com