You may select a new search term and repeat your search. Searches are not case sensitive, and you can use regular expressions in your queries.

Enter your search term: by: title, keyword, or context

   Query type: 
    Query was: lotze
  

Here are the matching lines in their respective documents. Select one of the highlighted words in the matching lines below to jump to that point in the document.

• Title: Spiritual Science/Treasure for Life: Lecture VI: The Evil
  Matching lines:
  • century, Hermann Lotze (181
  • educate it. Because Lotze does not belong to the atheists, but
  • — Lotze
  • That is why Lotze rejects the idea of
  • this would contradict the omnipotence of God. That is why Lotze
  • Lotze objects that we limit that above all what one can
  • Lotze and other thinkers said about the problem and riddle of
  • the evil. I want to draw your attention only to that what Lotze
  • Lotze turns against the German philosopher Leibniz (Gottfried
  • Lotze objects to it that one cannot speak
  • say, Lotze means that Leibniz limited the omnipotence of God
  • Lotze means now, there is still a way out.
  • realises evil. There Lotze asks, what, however, can one think
  • Then Lotze means —
  • that is not the human wisdom, Lotze thinks, which we cannot get
  • Lotze moves the wise understanding of the evil into an
  • wherever we go, yes, as Lotze says, they are totally
  • If we take Lotze's confession up, we can
  • like Lotze or other thinkers do stop if they consider the
• Title: Evil and Spiritual Science
  Matching lines:
  • Lotze, one of the most significant thinkers of the
  • most significant contemporaries, who like Hermann Lotze stood
  • Now Lotze was no atheist, but one who assumed God as living and
  • Against this Lotze objected at the same time: whoever gives
  • same animal kingdom issues? So Lotze turned away from the idea
  • since it was only possible then, Lotze thought, to extract the
  • preparing to be able to build goodness thereupon. So Lotze
  • — Against this Lotze objected: but then we limit what we
  • could add still other matters that Lotze and other thinkers
  • have said on the problem and riddle of evil — Lotze is
  • attention to that to which Lotze came to in the end, because
  • that will be important for us later. So Lotze turned against
  • one possible. — Now against this Lotze objected: in any
  • Lotze thought, Leibnitz has limited the omnipotence of God and
  • Lotze thought, there is still a way out. One must say: in
  • details. So Lotze said: but what can a viewpoint give, which
  • Lotze thought — and this was the culmination of his
  • not human wisdom Lotze thought: wisdom we cannot reach and
  • which justifies evil. So Lotze transposed the wise concepts of
  • we come up against step by step in life; and even as Lotze
  • Maximum number of matches per file exceeded.